Live in Darkness to Put Occupation in a New Light

From Tuesday through Thursday this week (11-09-11-11) there is an Electricity Fast at Loyola University Chicago.
If you would like to participate please visit:

Next to the Centennial Forum Student Union
1125 W. Loyola
on the grassy knoll

ADVANCE PREPARATION:

1.) Prepare and maintain a list of all media contacts including newspapers (weekly & daily), TV, and radio. Don’t neglect alternative and religious press. Your list should include names of friendly reporters as well as editors of the news desk, religion desk, etc. Make sure you have both phone and fax numbers.

2.) Check out the wire services in your area – AP (Associated Press), CP (Canadian Press), Reuters, UPI (United Press International). Wire services send out bulletins continually to most other media.

3.) Write a press release. (See guide: “WRITING A PRESS RELEASE“).

4.) Send or Fax press release to the news desk, city desk, special departments (women, religion, etc.) and specific reporters who have been friendly. The release should arrive several days before the event.

5.) Think of ways to write articles for periodicals, letters to the editor, etc.

6.) Several days before your event, the phone should be covered continuously.

7.) Put together a “press packet” for distribution on the day of the action. Include the press release, your best leaflet, and any helpful background information.

THE DAY BEFORE THE ACTION OR EVENT:

8.) Telephone all media. Give a brief run‑down of the action (who, what, where, when, why). Be enthusiastic and positive but not unrealistic. Stick to the purpose and underline the issue(s).

9.) Be prepared to re‑fax the press release immediately.

10.) Contact radio “news” stations. Many will tape telephone interviews from people at the action site and send directly to the radio station. Some will also tape 30 second spots in which you can read a prepared statement or sound‑byte.

11.) Make sure arrangements have been made for someone to take photos of the event. Pictures can be used in follow‑up work.

THE DAY OF THE ACTION:

12.) Call TV and radio stations early. Most assignments are made by 8:30 am. Ask them to come at least half an hour after the action is scheduled to start so they aren’t the first to arrive - a common problem.

13.) Have press packets available.

14.) Assign one or more persons to relate to the press and help them get good information and pictures. It is often helpful to have one or two people “hustle” the press ‑ ‑ take initiative to greet them and direct them to the press spokes people.

15.) Keep a press log of information on who shows up.

Adapted from Resource Manual for a Living Revolution; New Society Publishers, 1985

GETTING STARTED:

1.) Write “FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE” and indicate the DATE for the release at the top left of the page. At top right of page, list name and phone number of CONTACT PERSON. Use organizational LETTERHEAD if appropriate.

2.) A short but attention getting TITLE should state the subject of your release.

3.) Begin the first paragraph by writing the name of the PLACE from which you are reporting in capital letters followed by two dashes. This is relevant when reporting from a specific field location.

TIPS ON TEXT:

4.) The LEAD SENTENCE must concisely say only the MOST ESSENTIAL FACTS of the release. Save secondary elements and lengthier information about place and organizational names for later sentences.

5.) Use ACTIVE VOICE rather than passive. Example: “Anti-sanctions activists counter sue us government” as opposed to “U.S. government was counter sued by Anti-sanctions activists”.

6.) When announcing an event, include the TIME, DATE, PLACE, PARTICIPATING GROUPS, and REASONS for the action EARLY in the release.

7.) Limit the LENGTH of the release to ONE PAGE double spaced if possible. Define the basic 2-3 POINTS you want to make and avoid extraneous information. If longer than one page, write -MORE- centered at the bottom of the page. Your release should never be longer than two pages. You may include additional pages of background material if helpful, but they should be clearly separate from the press release.

8.) KEEP SENTENCES SHORT. Eliminate unnecessary words and phrases.

9.) Avoid “buzz words” and aim for a SIMPLE VOCABULARY.

10.) Don’t exaggerate information. Make it INTERESTING.

11.) Try to obtain at least one QUOTE. Mention support from well-known people and organizations if appropriate.

12.) Write so that your first paragraph could be used directly by a news editor and subsequent information could be cut from the bottom up. LESS IMPORTANT INFORMATION belongs in the LATER PARAGRAPHS of the release.

SIGNING OFF:

1. End your release by including a DESCRIPTION OF YOUR ORGANIZATION.

2. Finish by putting -30- centered at the bottom of the page.

Divestment

Divestment is a political tool that was developed during the anti-apartheid student movement. In the 80s, students protested their universities’ relationship to the racist South African economy and government. They discovered that their universities were investing in companies that both had racist hiring policies in South Africa and funded the white South African government in its attacks on blacks. The divestment campaign became a way to galvanize student support and challenged big corporations that were financing and benefiting from the exploitation and oppression of blacks. (Source: ucdivest.org)

What was apartheid?

Following independence from England, an uneasy power-sharing between the two groups held sway until the 1940’s, when the Afrikaner National Party was able to gain a strong majority. Strategists in the National Party invented apartheid as a means to cement their control over the economic and social system. Initially, aim of the apartheid was to maintain white domination while extending racial separation. Starting in the 60’s, a plan of “Grand Apartheid” was executed, emphasizing territorial separation and police repression. Race laws touched every aspect of social life, including a prohibition of marriage between non-whites and whites, and the sanctioning of “white-only” jobs. The Department of Home Affairs (a government bureau) was responsible for the classification of the citizenry. Non-compliance with the race laws were dealt with harshly. All blacks were required to carry “pass books” containing fingerprints, photo and information on access to non-black areas. (Source: www.students.stanford.edu)

Direct Divestment vs. Indirect Divestment

Direct divestment campaigns asks only those investors, groups, and corporations that are directly invested in the target corporation or country to divest. Indirect divestment campaigns asks that those investing in investment pools like mutual funds that include the target corporation or country to also divest.

Wholesale Divestment Campaign vs. Arms Divestment Campaign

Wholesale divestment asks investers and investment groups to completely withdraw all investments in a particular country. This is the type of campaign that was conducted against South Africa in the 1980s, asking that all companies doing business in the country to withdraw. Arms Divestment is not country-specific and instead advocates divesting from all corporations involved in developing and distributing weapons. Voices in the Wilderness is calling for Arms Divestment Campaigns across the country.

What is the INFACT campaign? Since 1977, Infact has been exposing life-threatening abuses by transnational corporations and organizing successful grassroots campaigns to hold corporations accountable to consumers and society at large. Infact started taking on the deadly nuclear weapons industry in 1984. The Nuclear Weaponmakers Campaign targeted industry leader and trendsetter General Electric for its role in promoting and producing nuclear weapons. Over four million people actively participated in the Campaign by boycotting GE. In 1991, Infact released a hard-hitting documentary video that contrasts GE’s “We Bring Good Things to Life” image with real-life stories of people harmed by radiation and toxic pollution from GE’s nuclear weapons work. Deadly Deception: General Electric, Nuclear Weapons and Our Environment won the Academy Award for Best Documentary: Short Subject in 1992, spreading the Boycott to over one billion TV viewers worldwide. This caused a publicity nightmare for GE. Growing pressure from the Boycott and over $75 million in lost medical equipment sales culminated on April 2, 1993, when Infact called off the boycott after GE bowed to overwhelming public demand and moved out of the nuclear weapons business. (Source: www.infact.org)

What are shareholder campaigns?

Shareholder activism is a way that shareholders can claim their power as company owners to influence a corporation’s behavior. A shareholder proposal is a shareholder’s (or group of shareholders’) recommendation or request that a company and/or its Board of Directors take a particular action relevant to company policy. In the United States, securities laws govern a process by which a shareholder has a right to introduce formal proposals, have the proposal circulated to all of the company’s shareholders, vote upon the resolution, and present it in person at company annual meetings. Shareholder rights and the ability of shareholders to offer proposals differ from country to country. Historically, the shareholder activism process is an attempt by investors to get information out of a firm and points of view into a firm that otherwise wouldn’t be there. Through shareholder activity, investors are constantly demanding more information from companies, and building on past efforts to gain greater transparency, democracy, and responsibility in Corporate America. (Source: www.foe.org)

The successes of Divestment campaigns

Between 1977 and October 1985, 55 universities and colleges across the U.S. had partially or fully divested from South Africa. 30 of those divested between April and October of 1985 due to protest actions. (Source: ucdivest.org). The fall of the apartheid regime took place in 1994. Currently, some groups are engaged in wholesale divestment campaigns from Israel.

The advantages of divestment campaigns

Divestment campaigns are more practical and direct than some more symbolic actions. Because universities depend on their reputation and integrity, a campaign that seeks to reveal a university’s allegiance to big weapons manufacturers will likely draw attention. The best place to start may be with the university’s mission statement, in order to see what ideals weapons investing might violate. For students interested in “getting their hands dirty” divestment campaigns may be the way to go.

The obstacles in a divestment campaign: Gathering information about your university’s investment policies and procedures can be difficult. Very large and very wealthy universities tend to be more forthcoming with such information, while smaller universities tend not to publicize it. Because of the bureaucratic procedures generally inherent in institutional investment, divestment campaigns tend to be long struggles. While they do not require a large number of people, divestment campaigns do usually require a few very committed people over several years in order to be successful.

Getting Started

The first step in a divestment campaign is to learn more about the big weapons manufacturers, your school’s investments, and your allies in the cause. Begin asking sympathetic students, faculty, Board of Trustees members, and alumni, what they think a divestment campaign on your campus might look like. Faculty could be helpful in answering historical questions about divestment campaigns against apartheid. Alumni can be helpful in building a sustainable divestment campaign and exerting pressure on the Board of Trustees to divest. Contact alumni involved in past apartheid campaigns to learn from history.

Keep In Touch!

Let Voices in the Wilderness know your plans for divestment and we will try to assist you with information and publicity. 773-784-8065 or luo@vitw.org.

ROTC directly benefits a foreign policy that is imperialistic and advocates preemptive war.

Choosing to have ROTC on campus is not a politically neutral choice. It is a choice which supports the current aggressive foreign policy. The pre emptive policy is not limited to Iraq; it will be extended elsewhere.

A campaign to end ROTC is not an attack on students in the ROTC program. They may join the military after graduation or attend West Point if that is their goal. They need not pursue officer training at a non military academy. The students may choose to form a club of individuals interested in the military, but there need not be an institutionally sponsored ROTC program.

If students are choosing ROTC for financial reasons then we are essentially asking them to risk their lives to pay for school. Moreover, we are asking them to put themselves in situations where they cannot think critically or follow their conscience because they must follow orders. Rather than sponsoring ROTC, colleges should develop financial aid programs to ensure that all are able to attend college, regardless of their economic class. Colleges should also lobby our government to increase federal financial aid in the form of grants to ensure that all students are able to attend college regardless of economic class.

The ideal of political neutrality may well be unattainable. Decisions of hiring, research, and funding of faculty all are political decisions. Given this reality, each institution must choose if it is willing to actively support pre emptive war or if it would prefer to allow the military to do its wars on its own. Neutrality is assent to the status quo.

For more information on counter recruitment and anti ROTC campaigns, contact Voices in the Wilderness, 773.784.8065, or luo@vitw.org.